I have been watching basketball since I was very young. It's my favorite sport. Kobe Bryant has always been my favorite, Steph Curry is my current favorite, and we had Warriors season tickets as a family for a while.
My sister always held the conspiracy theory to be true — the one about the NBA deciding who wins. I always felt that was a bit foolish.
Then I watched the Thunder play the Spurs in the Western Conference Finals. I watched SGA BARELY get touched and shoot free throw after free throw, and I watched the Spurs get beat up by the Thunder. I have heard the conspiracy theories and never gave them credence. But I personally felt like the Thunder were getting the calls and the Spurs were not.
Here's the part I didn't expect to matter. I had just written through my book — a novel that centers on a conspiracy theory about celebrities disappearing to a secret island and faking their deaths. Writing the book made me think through the realities of what these conspiracies would actually have to entail. The silence. The coordination. The cost of one person talking.
So when it looked like SGA and the Thunder might be part of one, I didn't believe it and I didn't dismiss it. I asked what it would take.
I landed somewhere in the middle. What surprised me was that there was a likely version — and it was less a conspiracy than a monetary and business move. The league leans into its stars. It's for popularity, for growing the following. It's commercialism more than anything.
But I still have a wonder about whether there's an idea of who should win. A push toward certain endings.